-01 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 R 07 08 09 10 11 12

XXXXXXXX

サバキ

NOTES


3.17

A bit of wine-soaked despair hit me Thursday evening just as I had completed the MIDI path out. I expressed this to Mrs. Skunkwork as a feeling of pressure—a lack of time. What I didn't say, because I couldn't admit it to myself at the time, was that I had stayed in code longer than necessary because I was hiding from the unexpected difficulty I experienced this week attempting to switch into thinking visually for the art and design components, which now need to be returned to in order to complete this loop.

The idea was so unwieldy and large I said that I felt there wasn't enough time to have a full outer life and still be able to completely submerge as deeply as I felt was necessary to complete the project. It felt impossible in the moment. Ms. Skunkwork refused to accept the idea that a person could not be both an artist and healthy. It took another day of thinking and some good games of Go to understand that she was right. Health is a requirement, not an impediment.

Beautiful weather arrived just in time the next day. After a very good breakfast on our sunny porch, I read (or reread?) the Borges story 'The Immortal' and drank coffee and listened to the birds. We drove to the next town and hung out in a small comic shop and talked to the owner. The wind and road were restorative, and I confessed to Ms. Skunkwork that I thought she had been right and that I thought I would write about it today. I told her about the difficulty with switching over into a visual mode. Mr. Frink (skunkfriend) drove that clearly home. "It's interesting since that [the highly demanding multi-discipline approach] was kind of an initially attractive part of the project. It probably still is or can be."

The difficulty in switching over from code brain and remembering how to be excited by a visual design had confronted me with an uncomfortable fear of failing my own premise and had provided me with an easy out. "Too difficult, too complex, too much time required." Fortunately, the answer was also in the complaint. Hiding, in the work itself, from the effort required to be relaxed and present and observant enough to be inspired to something genuine, is deadly.

This little crisis has also been a good reminder of another component of the original premise; that the work should inform itself as much as possible from step to step rather than adhering to a plan—that to complete something both complex and honest, it must be done with patience, devotion, and open feeling.

The homeward arc of these loops is more treacherous to that idea than I had anticipated, it is too easy to make a checklist when an -ish final form can be imagined. Gratitude to Ms. Skunkwork, Mr. Frink, and all the bird friends.

None of these rewrites has completely abandoned everything from the previous version so I feel like the iterative process is working -even if it is taking much longer than I thought to complete a loop. With this rewrite I was also able to tune the fish more accurately, they now trigger off of this traveling sync object and the timing of each individual behavioral state feels more ‘fair’. To speed up testing I built out an AutoPlay feature. I like it so much I think ill incorporate a panel of switches in the next round of physical builds to activated this mode and to hide/show the math.

3.10

It feels fantastic to light the lighter on the small screen with the big clunky buttons. The sense of mechanical “object-ness” is uncanny and immediate. I gleefully described this to a friend as “a + b = spaghetti”. The way forward is still as open and vague and process oriented as ever, but I’ve gained some additional confidence in the foundational principles. Next I think I’ll try to push the complexity of the interaction a bit.

2.18

“The coastline paradox is the counterintuitive observation that the coastline of a landmass does not have a well-defined length. This results from the fractal curve–like properties of coastlines; i.e., the fact that a coastline typically has a fractal dimension. Although the "paradox of length" was previously noted by Hugo Steinhaus, the first systematic study of this phenomenon was by Lewis Fry Richardson, and it was expanded upon by Benoit Mandelbrot. The measured length of the coastline depends on the method used to measure it and the degree of cartographic generalization. “ wiki

11.12